[Dear Editor:]
I’m quite happy to take that letter off my blog and replace it with an “essentialized” version. As for communication, that will not likely happen in a meaningful way, anyhow. Yeah, name calling is anathema to them but not for them. Their name calling is adjectival or classificatory? How sophisticated! BTW, you ought to see some of their ‘comments’ on my blog. That’s where I give ’em hell back. Not many viewers dip into it,but if you want to see belittling remarks, look in there at theirs. While we’re at it, maybe I should complain about the unreconstructed wing-nuttiness of my critics. These guys are not traditional conservatives. Always on the attack, their intellect is given over to gaining power, not to revealing truth. In fact, they continually conceal their real premises and show little grasp of the consequences of reaching their objective. I see their entire semblence of reason as based on chagrin, reacting to losing the 2008 election, or worry that slow recovery keeps their portfolio values low whether jobs return or not. What wonders would they or we have seen had the GOP ticket won? Gad! It beggars thought. If their agenda (covert though it seems) prevails in 2012, the House looks ready to ‘disappear’ all this country’s gains from the 20th century. Rather than get on sound footing, we’d be thrown back down to 1910 or 1870! Wish mid-2000 back.
No Comments